As many of us have learned the hard way, lifting every day can lead to overtraining and even injury. But just how long should you let a muscle group recover before you train it again anyway?
That’s what Canadian researchers recently set out to discover. To do this, they looked at the rate of protein synthesis (muscle growth) after a heavy biceps weight-training session. By knowing how long muscle protein synthesis is elevated following a workout, we can figure out how long it takes for that muscle to recover.
In the study, muscle protein synthesis was measured after four sets of single arm biceps curls at 80 percent of the subjects’ one-rep max for a total of 12 sets. Each set was performed to failure, and a three- to four-minute rest period was allowed between sets.
The results of the study, which were published in the Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, showed that four hours after exercise, the rate of muscle protein synthesis was 50 percent greater in the exercised arm compared to the nonexercised arm. Twenty-four hours after exercise, the rate of muscle protein synthesis was 110 percent in the exercised arm. By 36 hours after exercise, the rate of muscle protein synthesis was only 14 percent greater than the control group.
According to the researchers, the most effective training frequency would be such that the next training session for the same body part would not occur until the protein synthesis rate for that body part returned to its pre-training rate. For a small muscle group like the biceps, this looks to be no earlier than 36 hours. Larger muscle groups, such as the quadriceps, may take even longer to recover.
BOTTOM LINE:
Training a body part before its synthesis rate returns to the pre-exercise rate may actually be detrimental to the muscle and lead to overtraining. If you want to grow, you need to take time to let your body recover.
Why Critics of Mike Mentzer and Dorian Yates Get It Wrong About HIT Training Mike Mentzer’s Heavy Duty and Dorian Yates’ High-Intensity Training (HIT) built some of the most jaw-dropping physiques in bodybuilding history. Yet, exercise scientists and fitness influencers who couldn’t match their results in a thousand lifetimes still line up to critique their methods. These so-called experts cite studies on high-volume training, conveniently ignoring that these studies often use untrained subjects and lack the intensity Mentzer and Yates demanded. Meanwhile, the comments sections of YouTube videos defending HIT are packed with lifters swearing by its effectiveness, saying, “The proof is in the pudding.” When it comes to real results, no one questions the legends who dominated the stage with efficiency, precision, and unparalleled intensity. Read on to discover why Mentzer and Yates’ methods are still the gold standard for serious lifters.